Who is at increased risk of IUD expulsion?

New research holds some surprises about who’s at highest risk of expelling an IUD.

by Justin Diedrich, MD, and Tessa Madden, MD, MPH

published 07/05/15

"Reason for visit: Possible expulsion." When we hear this, we always hope our patient is mistaken.

An expulsion is when an intrauterine device (IUD) comes out of the uterus on its own and it happens for about 1 in 20 IUD users. Expulsion leaves the patient vulnerable to unintended pregnancy. A recent study by Madden and colleagues examined this phenomenon and the risk factors associated with it.

What causes an expulsion?

One thought is that expulsions are due to a small uterus—for example, when the patient is young or has not yet had a baby. Biologically, this makes sense. If we try to place an IUD inside a uterus that is barely larger than the device, wouldn't there be a higher chance the uterus will expel it? Despite the importance of this question, it has been hard to answer.

Studying expulsion

The new study focused on IUD users participating in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. The CHOICE Project was a study of over 9,000 women who received contraceptive counseling, were given the method of their choice at no cost, then were followed for up to 3 years afterwards. For this analysis, every participant with a suspected expulsion had her chart reviewed by two of the investigators. Among the 5,053 women who received an IUD, there were 432 expulsions. This amounts to 6.2 expulsions per 100 IUD users over the course of a year. This is around what we would expect based on previous research.

What did the study find?

The great thing about this study is that it had enough women using IUDs to look at smaller groups of women. This let us explore whether age, parity, or other characteristics of our patients were related to expulsion. The study found that:

  • Women under age 20 had a higher rate of expulsion (10.5/100 women per year).

  • Among women over age 20, those who were nulliparous had a lower expulsion rate compared to those who had one or more children (3.2 versus 7.2/100, respectively).

  • Nulliparous women using the levonorgestrel IUD (Mirena™) had lower expulsion than parous women (3.8 versus 7.9/100).

  • Nulliparous women using the copper IUD (ParaGard™) had slightly more expulsions than parous women, although this finding was not statistically significant (6.0 versus 5.5/100).

  • Women with self-reported heavier periods at baseline had a higher rate of expulsion overall (8.8/100).

  • In a model controlling for women’s characteristics, only being under age 20 and heavy periods were associated with increased risk of expulsion for both types of IUD.

That teens have a higher expulsion rate is not news. But the observation that parity was not associated with expulsion is. With the ACOG recommendation to offer IUDs to women as a first line option, this finding could help allay concerns about providing IUDs to nulliparous women. It’s also important to keep these findings in context. Expulsions happen, but they occur in a minority of patients.

What does this mean for practice?

The largest implication of this study is that parity was not associated with IUD expulsion. Women who are younger and those with heavy menses at baseline are at a higher risk of expulsion, but the IUD should remain among the contraceptive options they consider. All women deserve access to the most effective methods of contraception—regardless of their age, menses, or whether or not they have had children yet.

Justin Diedrich, MD, completed a residency in Obstetrics & Gynecology at the University of California, Irvine and he is currently a clinical fellow in Family Planning at Washington University in St Louis. Dr. Diedrich also serves on the Board of Directors of Choice USA. Tessa Madden, MD, MPH is an Associate Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Washington University in St. Louis. She is active in patient care, clinical research, and education. She completed her obstetrics and gynecology residency at Columbia University in New York City and a Family Planning Fellowship at the Johns Hopkins University where she also received her MPH from the Bloomberg School of Public Health. She currently serves on the board for the Society of Family Planning.
read more about:birth control,health and wellness,shoptalk
read our commenting policy »